In most hospital settings particularly in bigger tertiary hospitals, HMO comprises a great percentage of patients. Sometimes the numbers may reach half or even more of those availing services.
Engagement in HMO as a health service provider is a personal decision you have to make. In some outpatient ambulatory set up, it becomes part of the arrangement. So, To HMO or not to HMO?
Lets take a look at the pros and cons.
1. Provides a steady stream of patients. This is helpful for start ups who are building their patient base.
2. It can be a source of referral. If the patients like you, they can tell friends and relatives, with HMO or not.
3. For pediatricians who offer other services other than consult like vaccination, patients are more likely to avail of your other services once you have engaged them in regular consults.
1. Fees maybe smaller than your regular consult or professional fee for in patients depending on where you practice.
2. Payments may take months. But if it is consistent, eg. every two months, then it becomes a cycle that evens out. If it becomes unpredictable,then the amount the HMO owes you becomes bigger through time.
3. You need to fill out forms for documentation. You will be required to submit these forms and provide summaries in order to be paid your fees.
4. You need to keep files and reconcile which services rendered has been paid or not.
But HMO or not, our patients deserve the same quality of care.
To HMO or not to HMO? What do you think? Please comment below if you can think of other pros and cons. If you find these information useful, please share or like us on facebook.
photo credit: naypong/freedigitalphotos.net